وبلاگ

provided, in addition, that this section does not authorize a judge to compel a witness to answer a question or produce a document that the witness may refuse or produce under sections 121 to 131, including, if the question has been asked or if documents have been requested by the opposing party; nor can the judge ask a question that would be inappropriate for another person under section 148 or 149; Nor does it waive primary evidence of a document, except in the cases mentioned above. [114-A. Presumption of lack of consent in some rape prosecutions. (c) if the original has been destroyed or lost, or if the party providing evidence of its contents is unable to provide it in a timely manner for any other reason not based on its own omission or negligence; [(f) if the original is a document of which a certified copy may be presented as evidence under this Act or any other Law in force in [India]; Provided that such a reply, to which a witness must be compelled, does not subject him to arrest or prosecution in criminal proceedings or is proved against him, with the exception of proceedings for false testimony by such a reply. 3. proving previous statements that are inconsistent with some of his evidence that may be contradicted; 119. Stupid witnesses. – A witness who cannot speak may give his testimony in any other way by which he can make it comprehensible, for example in writing or by signs; but such a script must be written and the signs made in open session. The evidence thus presented is considered oral testimony. (1) by the evidence of the persons who testify that they believe, on the basis of the knowledge of the witness, that he is not worthy of recognition; (2) by proving that the witness was bribed or accepted the offer of bribery or received any other corrupt inducement to testify; Where the oral taking of evidence concerns the existence or status of a case of substance other than a document, the Court may, if it considers it appropriate, require the production of that substantive case for the purposes of its review. The Explanatory Note to Article 90, Subsection 1, also applies to the Section. “78-A. Copies of public documents that, in some cases, must be as good as the original documents. Letters between the parties relating to the issue giving rise to the defamation and which form part of the correspondence in which it is contained are relevant facts, although they do not contain the defamation itself.

Bengal. (Amended by Act 20 of 1960, section 3, w.e.f. 5.1.1961) In accordance with Article 78, the following new section shall be inserted: (3) copies made of or compared with the original; `1. The existing section shall be renumbered in Article 90(1) and (4) in return for the documents relating to the parties which have not carried it out;. (b) where the existence, condition or content of the original has been acknowledged in writing by the person to whom it is proved or by his representative; 2. This presumption does not apply to documents that form the basis of an action or defence or that are invoked in the appeal or written statement. (2) any mental state of which a person is aware. where the proceedings have taken place between the same parties or their stakeholders; (1) Persons who have an interest in the property or ownership of the subject matter of the proceedings and who make the declaration in their nature by persons who have an interest in it, or Uttar Pradesh.

– The following amendments have been made to Article 90 and a new Article 90-A has been amended in accordance with the U.P. (b) during that period, information of the type contained in the electronic record or information from which the information thus contained is derived has been regularly entered into the computer in the normal course of those activities; Using your phone`s camera, scan the following code and download the Kindle app.